Steve Madison was first elected in March 1999 to represent District 6, which includes the beautiful West Pasadena neighborhoods above the Rose Bowl and in Southwest Pasadena, much of Old Pasadena, the Art Center College of Design, the Convention Center & Civic Auditorium, most of the Arroyo Seco, the historic Colorado Street Bridge, and the Tournament of Roses House (Wrigley Mansion). He was re-elected in 2003, 2007 and in 2011. While a Councilmember, Steve has served as Vice Mayor, on the Council's Economic Development & Technology Committee, Public Safety Committee and Legislative Policy Committee, on the Pasadena Center Operating Company Board, on the Multimodal Operations and Development Entity Board and on the Youth Development and Violence Prevention Task Force, and he is one of Pasadena’s three appointees to the Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena Airport Authority Commission, which oversees the Bob Hope Airport in Burbank. During his 14 years on the Council, Steve has championed neighborhood protection and the preservation of Pasadena's high quality of life; a vibrant commercial environment in the Central District; high quality municipal services, especially in the area of public safety; Pasadena's "Green City" environmental initiatives; and assisting the Pasadena Unified School District in ensuring every child in our community reaches his or her full potential. In 2000, Steve authored and secured adoption by the City Council of a resolution opposing the extension of the 710 freeway through Pasadena, and has repeatedly asked his Council colleagues to oppose the 710 tunnel. Steve was the first Councilmember to advocate for a General Plan Guiding Principle in support of public education. A practicing trial lawyer and a Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, Steve is a partner with Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP in Los Angeles. He joined the firm after spending nine years as an Assistant United States Attorney, where he prosecuted federal criminal cases including major narcotics, political corruption and defense contracting fraud cases. He assisted in the prosecution of United States v. Koon (the federal criminal civil rights case arising out of the beating of Rodney King), and was lead prosecutor in United States v. Congressman Walter R. Tucker, III; he was commended for his work in both cases by U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno. Steve taught for 10 years as an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Law School, and he served as a Judge Pro Tem of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. He has been named a Southern California “Super Lawyer” and one of Pasadena’s Top Attorneys by Pasadena Magazine. Raised in Northern California, Steve attended public schools and graduated from the University of Santa Clara with a B.A. in English. He then attended Boston College and USC Law Schools, and in addition to his Juris Doctor degree he has a Master of Public Administration (with honors) from USC. Steve supports numerous non-profit organizations in Pasadena and has served on the boards of First Tee of Pasadena and the Pasadena Police Activities League (he is a graduate of the Pasadena Citizens Police Academy).
Hundreds of Linda Vistans and their guests came together as a community to celebrate Linda Vista Park. There was plenty of activity for everyone as exhibits and activities kept everyone engaged. Pasadena Police brought their SWAT vehicle, the Bearcat, and the Neighborhood Watch Team. Firefighters from the Linda Vista Fire Station mingled with the crowd. Arlington Garden had a tasting of marmalade with oranges grown at the garden. Arroyo Seco Foundation provided education on plants and natural environments. Pasadena Water and Power showed the latest in conservation tools. Friends of the Library had a book exchange. There were dogs to walk, pet and adopt from the Pasadena Humane Society. Puppet making by the Armory Center for the Arts and Dancing with a star were special activities for kids of all ages. All of this happened with the beat of “The Centerfolds,” a locally grown rock band. The gourmet food trucks selling burgers, ice cream sandwiches on freshly baked cookies and fountain drinks rounded out the day. With such a successful event, we’re sure to have another Picnic in the Park next year. Thank you neighbors, the special guests and particularly the chair, Betsy Nathane and the committee. The space will remain a park for Linda Vistans to enjoy and the City will start planning for park improvements.
Click here to view the photos >>
Through the generous donation of the Tournament of Roses and the City of Pasadena’s development fees for parks, the City was able to add nine historic lampposts to light the path by Defenders Park. A hearty group of neighbors, Tournament of Roses volunteers, District 6 constituents and staff braved a cold night and threatening skies to meet at sunset to celebrate the completion of a long awaited project. To commemorate this event, a plaque was unveiled. In the photo you’ll see Mayor Bill Bogaard, Councilmember Steve Madison, Vice-President of the Tournament of Roses, Richard Chinen and City Manager, Michael Beck.
Many thanks to all.
View photos of the event >>
All photos Photos Courtesy of Tournament of Roses/Long Photography.
The community and staff came together to celebrate the ground breaking for Station 39. Closed since April 2011 due to serious seismic problems, the station will open after a complete seismic retrofit and remodeling of the interior to meet ADA and green standards. We thank Sue Mossman of Pasadena Heritage for her participation regarding the historic significance of the mid-century modern building. We also express thanks to the San Rafael Library Associates and the Pasadena Fire Fighters Association for their participation in making this a special day for the whole family.
The building will be ready for operation in late Fall of this year. ( The station was closed April 2011 when a safety report stated that the building was not safe for the occupants, the firefighters.)
View the photos >>
Fire Station 39 Groundbreaking Ceremony
SGM Letter Antonovich 710 Panel
I am pleased to announce that after many years of waiting, the City accepted possession of the Desiderio property from the Federal Government. The City is working on the EIR (Environmental Impact Report) as it plans to demolish the buildings. This process should take about a year. Funding is in place to move forward with the development of the open place. This project will expand the City’s open space, make one of the most beautiful vistas of the Colorado Bridge accessible to all, and add affordable housing under Habitat for Humanity for many families.
Attend an Open House on the SR710 Alternatives and Contact State Representatives
District 6 Constituents, Below please download the dates for METRO’s meetings where its staff will present information on the SR710 alternatives. Our participation at these meetings is very important.
SR 710 Meeting DatesIn addition, I strongly suggest that you write about your position to our state elected officials. State Senator Carol Liu 501 N. Central Avenue Glendale, CA 91203 1-818-409-0400 Email her field assistant for transportation, Vickere Murphy at email@example.com. State Assemblyman Chris Holden Current Address: 215 N. Marengo Avenue, #115 Pasadena, CA 91109 626-577-9944 If you reside in the 41st Assembly District: Go to www.asm.ca.gov/holden. Scroll down to CONTACT CHRIS to leave your email message. If you reside outside of the 41st Assembly District or if you prefer to use this address, email your message to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Our continued collective effort to express our positions to elected official is important.. Many thanks and I wish you a Happy New Year! Councilmember Steve Madison
Three of my colleagues let us down last night. I moved to formally oppose the disastrous tunnel proposal for the 710 freeway extension, but my motion failed by a 4-3 vote; even though our Council only has seven members presently because of Chris Holden's election to the State Assembly, five votes are still required for Council action. (You may recall that on August 13, I made a motion that the Council oppose three alternative routes around Avenue 64 in West Pasadena, and on that occasion my motion carried unanimously.)Before the roll call vote, I implored my colleagues to support my motion on the grounds that a huge 6-mile underground highway tunnel would have devastating consequences for Pasadena, would disrupt our quality of life and threaten historic neighborhoods, be unsafe and be deleterious to the health of all of us (particularly seniors, school-aged children and those with health problems such as patients at Huntington Memorial Hospital and the clinics and medical offices around the hospital). I asked my colleagues to follow the advice of virtually all the community members and groups and experts who have weighed in on this, as well as our friend and former Assembly member Anthony Portantino who spoke eloquently in favor of my motion last night. I reminded them, too, that I convened a forum at the Convention Center on 9/18, at which a panel of experts all described the tunnel as a major threat to our community's health and safety, and hundreds of residents turned out to oppose the tunnel. I explained that Measure A presented no impediment whatsoever because of the three "T's" -- tunnel, trucks, and toll -- which were not on the table when Measure A was voted on in 2001. I told them that we needed to be clear and unambiguous with CalTrans and Metro, the agencies that will make the decision about the scope of the EIR for the 710 freeway extension, that the tunnel is a non-starter. All we needed last night was one more vote. Mayor Bill Bogaard, Councilmember Victor Gordo, Councilmember Gene Masuda and I voted yes. Regrettably, Vice Mayor McAustin, Councilmember Jackie Robinson and Councilmember Terry Tornek voted no. Councilmember Tornek led the group unwilling to oppose the tunnel, stating that most of his constituents with whom he has spoken support the 710 extension! He said more study was needed, and that an environmental impact report should go forward on the tunnel project. I responded that we do not need an EIR to know the tunnel would be disastrous for our community. In and of itself, a lengthy EIR process including the tunnel as an alternative could severely impact property values in West Pasadena and move the tunnel closer to adoption. I asked the three dissenters to focus on leadership not arithmetic (i.e., politics). I told Terry and the others that one could not say he opposes the tunnel but not vote to oppose the tunnel. I said now was no time to get weak in the knees. All to no avail.Just a couple of weeks ago, Terry was the lone vote in opposition to an EIR commissioned by the Rose Bowl Operating Company regarding the potential temporary use of the Rose Bowl for professional football games on a short-term basis (I will be posting a more lengthy message about this issue soon). At the time he said he thought the mere approval of the EIR would negatively impact property values in the neighborhoods around the Rose Bowl. So the hypothetical possibility of additional football games in our football stadium for a season or two will diminish property values, but the construction and operation of a 6-mile tunnel under historic neighborhoods, schools and hospitals won't? Ironic to say the least. I intend to raise the issue again, perhaps after Chris's seat (Council District 3) is filled. Those interested in the threat of the tunnel proposal would be well served to pay close attention to the March municipal elections and where the candidates--and incumbents--stand on this important issue. P.S. –You can watch the meeting, our deliberations and the vote at: http://cityofpasadena.net/District6/ (Below the bio you will see information about last night's meeting, including a link to the video.)Here are some of the officials who are handling the 710 freeway extension; I encourage you to share your view with them:METRO Board of Supervisors, chaired by the Honorable Mike Antonovich: Supervisor Antonovich email@example.com Transportation Deputy Michael Cano firstname.lastname@example.org
Full METRO Board list available here: http://www.metro.net/about/board/executives/
METRO CEO Art Leahy LEAHYA@metro.net
Executive Director Doug Failing email@example.com Administrative Offices: 213.922.6000 Caltrans Director Malcolm Doherty Caltrans_Director@dot.ca.gov District 7 (LA & Orange County) Director, Michael Miles firstname.lastname@example.org (213) 897-3656 Office of Governor Jerry Brown http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
The Pasadena City Council is scheduled to take up the 710 issue again on Monday, December 10th at 7:30 p.m. at the Pasadena Convention Center. The City obtained a legal analysis from an outside lawyer to further analyze the impact and relevance that Measure A has today and to determine if the City Council can take a position that might oppose the F-7 Tunnel Alternative. The outside attorney will be present at the meeting and the agenda report will include his conclusions. The agenda and reports will be available on the City’s website by late Thursday afternoon. Check www.cityofpasadena.net. Search City Council Agenda. You will recall that there were problems with the live broadcast from the Convention Center. Staff is working on a solution to accommodate live broadcast of this meeting. If successful, the weblink will be included on the agenda on Thursday. It will air on KPAS (Charter Channel 3, ATT&T Channel 99) on Tuesday, December 11 at 2 p.m. and will replay throughout the week. The schedule will be available on-line at www.pasadenamedia.org. The meeting will be available on the City’s website by Wednesday morning.
SR 710 EIR-EIS TAC Mtg #7 Agenda
SR 710 EIR-EIS TAC Mtg #7 (Aug 2012) Tech Memo on Performance of Alternatives (Summary of Results)
While our work is not done, this is a great start! Below please find a summary from Fred Dock, Director of Transportation Steve Madison District 6 Councilmember The following/attached just in from Metro. Per the information below, it appears that the Metro staff recommendation at the August 29, 2012, meeting will be to eliminate a series of alternatives for the SR 710 corridor and to recommend five alternatives for further study. The five alternatives recommended to be advanced are noted below using the numbering scheme developed for the study which can be translated as follows:
Please note that the SR 710 TAC meeting has been moved to the Metro Board Room at Gateway Plaza.
On Monday, August 13, before 700 constituents, my fellow City Councilmembers unanimously supported my motion soundly rejecting three alternatives for the 710 freeway extension proposed by METRO/Caltrans. In the ensuing week, my colleagues and I have continued to express to METRO/Caltrans in the strongest terms our objections to these routes. I am working with the City Manager, as well, to determine the impact of yet another METRO/Caltrans proposal: a tunnel extension, apparently designed to include truck traffic. Although these strides towards protecting our neighborhoods have been considerable, and although I am gratified that my Council colleagues have joined me in my opposition to the plans METRO/Caltrans have proposed, I am well-aware that our work has only just begun. The Council's decision was just a first step, and it is more important now than ever to keep our objections and questions in the forefront of all 710 discussions going on at METRO, Caltrans, the METRO Board, and especially in the Governor's Office. These are the authorities that will make the next round of decisions about the future of the potential 710 extension in Pasadena, and we cannot afford to become complacent now that the immediate threat of a surface route through San Rafael has passed. I urge you all to contact all of these agencies and persons as frequently as possible—let's make sure they know of our resolve. METRO Board of Supervisors, chaired by the Honorable Mike Antonovich: Supervisor Antonovich email@example.com Transportation Deputy Michael Cano firstname.lastname@example.org Full METRO Board list available here: http://www.metro.net/about/board/executives/ METRO CEO Art Leahy LEAHYA@metro.net Executive Director Doug Failing email@example.com Administrative Offices: 213.922.6000 Caltrans Director Malcolm Doherty Caltrans_Director@dot.ca.gov District 7 (LA & Orange County) Director, Michael Miles firstname.lastname@example.org (213) 897-3656 Office of Governor Jerry Brown http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
Finally, please mark these important dates on your calendars. On Tuesday, September 18, I will be moderating a community forum on the 710, to be held in Room 107 at the Convention Center at 7:00 p.m. Experts in science and medicine, and staff from METRO and Caltrans will be on the panel, so this is another excellent opportunity to be heard on this issue. On September 25th, I will host a Quarterly Town Hall Meeting at Westridge School, Braun Auditorium at 6:30. Closer to these dates, check for more information at http://www.cityofpasadena.net/district6.
PASADENA CITY COUNCIL POSITION ON CERTAIN SR-710 EXTENSIONS AND RESOLUTION (August 14, 2012)
To find City Council’s letter to METRO Board Chair, Mike Antonovich and the Council’s Resolution, open the link below.
City Council Letter to Metro Board Chair and Council's Resolution
Last night, hundreds of residents came to the City Council meeting to voice their opposition to LA METRO’s proposed alternative routes for the 710 freeway—routes that would have decimated neighborhoods throughout West Pasadena. I am deeply grateful to all who attended (notwithstanding some daunting technical problems with the sound system) and especially to my fellow Councilmembers who unanimously supported my resolution to oppose Alternatives F-5 (tunnel connecting I-10 to SR-134), H-2 (arterial road along Avenue 64), and H-6 (highway along Huntington Dr./Fair Oaks/Pasadena Avenue). Unfortunately, my Council colleagues would not agree to oppose proposed route F-7 (tunnel connecting I-10 with I-210) as I requested. The Council did direct staff to continue analyzing whether we can oppose Alternative F-7 notwithstanding Measure A. It will be important to pay close attention to this issue as I continue to oppose the alternatives. The Council’s decision is just a first step. It’s time to let the METRO board know that they must no longer consider these routes as part of any study or EIR. Although I asked the METRO staff repeatedly last night when the METRO board will eliminate certain routes from consideration, they could only answer that in October there will be an information item regarding the status of staff’s analysis of potential routes to be studied. I urge everyone to write to the METRO board to express your adamant opposition to the alternatives . The METRO board meets every fourth Thursday of the month (except August), at 9 a.m. in the 3rd Floor METRO Boardroom at 1 Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012. The chair of the METRO board is LA County Board of Supervisor Mike Antonovich. Here is his contact information:
email@example.com www.antonovich.com 215 N. Marengo Avenue, #120 Pasadena, CA 91101-1505 626-356-5407 For those interested in knowing more about the meeting last night, the video of the meeting is available on the City’s website, www.cityofpasadena.net/CouncilAgendas/Videos. Scroll down and look for: Archive Meetings. KPAS, Charter Cable Channel 3 will rebroadcast the meeting on Saturday August 18th at 2:30 and 10 p.m. KABC 7 posted some immediate post-meeting thoughts: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/los_angeles&id=8772234 NBC 4’s video coverage of the meeting is still in the process of being uploaded, but one part is available at http://www.nbclosangeles.com/video/#!/on-air/as-seen-on/Resident-to-Metro---22You-Cannot-Dig-Up-People-s-Homes-22/166078156 Finally, the Pasadena Sun shared its perspective of last night's meeting, here: http://www.pasadenasun.com/the626now/tn-626-pasadena-slams-freeway-proposals,0,1238765.story & the San Gabriel Valley Tribune updated their comments, here: http://www.sgvtribune.com/news/ci_21306478/pasadena-city-council-considers-opposition-710-extension Check periodically on the District 6 website www.cityofpasadena.net/district6 for updates. Posted messages contain important information about the District 6 Forum on the SR710 on September 18th and the Quarterly Town Hall Meeting on September 25th.
METRO MEETINGS AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13 AT THE PASADENA CONVENTION CENTER (August 7, 2012)
Councilmember Steve Madison asked me to share a number of important pieces of information—some of which you may have received from other sources. • Keeping Track of METRO Meetings • Venue Change for Community Liaison Council Meetings For August 8th in Pasadena • City Press Release on the August 13th Council Meeting (includes information on METRO and offsite viewing). Keep Track of METRO Meetings To keep track of the METRO meetings please use this website: http://www.metro.net/projects/sr-710-conversations/ When at this page make sure you click on the tab that says “ Upcoming Meetings” Venue Change for August 8th Pasadena/Altadena CLC MeetingDue to the overwhelming response from the community of Pasadena and in an attempt to best facilitate the projected amount of attendees, the location of the Pasadena/Altadena Community Liaison Council (CLC) meeting this Wednesday, August 8th from 6:30-7:30 pm, has been changed. Community Liaison Council (CLC) Meetings We have listed only those in the immediate area as the they will address the routes that most affect the Pasadena community. Note that the one for Pasadena is tomorrow, Wednesday. Pasadena CLC: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 6:30 - 7:30 PM Pasadena Scottish Rite Center 150 N Madison Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 South Pasadena: Thursday, August 9, 2012 6:30 - 7:30 PM Garfield Youth House 625 Stratford Av South Pasadena, CA 91030 Foothills: Monday, August 13, 2012 6:30 - 7:30 PM La Canada High School 4463 Oak Grove Dr La Canada, CA 91011 Please read the news release from the City of Pasadena.
I share your outrage and anger regarding the proposed 710 freeway routes. I have personally opposed the completion of the 710 in Pasadena and was the sponsor of the successful City Council resolution against completion in 2000. I also opposed Measure A, which as you know passed City-wide in 2001 (even though an overwhelming majority of us in West Pasadena voted "no"). I find these new iterations being proposed by METRO/CalTrans particularly egregious, as they would cut directly through West Pasadena, devastating our neighborhoods and generating pollution, noise and traffic along the Arroyo Seco. Next Monday's City Council meeting, at which this issue will be formally agendized, will be very important. To accommodate the anticipated huge public interest, the meeting has been moved from City Hall to the Convention Center. Here are the details: Monday, August 13, at 6:30 P.M.; Pasadena Convention Center, Room 107 At that time I intend to lay out a strong case that the City of Pasadena oppose these proposed routes, and I am hopeful my fellow Councilmembers will join me. Meanwhile, I thank you all for getting the word out to friends and neighbors throughout the City and region, and asking them to join us in opposition to these routes.
I want to express thanks to so many constituents who came to the City Council to address concerns related to the 710 Freeway. No doubt this is a very substantial issue that requires a thoughtful and measured response. There's no rush to judgment on the part of the staff and we're aware that we must address this issue thoroughly. As an attorney in private practice for 30 years, it is my opinion that Measure A provides no impediment to our opposing these insane routes. I feel your sense of urgency in this matter but believe we have adequate time to weigh in on the matter. In the words of John Paul Jones, "We have not yet begun to fight." Please come to the City Council Meeting on August 13, Pasadena Convention Center, Room 107 at 6:30PM when the City Council will take up the matter. Please mark your calendars for these District 6 sponsored events as well:
For past statements on the SR710, please check www.cityofpasadena.net/district6 Look below the bio
Steve Madison Pasadena Councilmember
(Sent July, 19, 2012)
Many of you have contacted me about the appalling 710 Freeway routes that METRO/Caltrans has proposed. As you know, back in 2000, I proposed and achieved passage of a resolution by the City Council opposing the completion of the 710 in Pasadsena. Thereafter, in March 2001, the residents of Pasadena voted on a local ballot initiative reversing the Council’s resolution, and proposing instead that the policy of the City be to support the completion of the 710. At that time the a surface route along Pasadena Avenue was the option being proposed. Since then, Caltrans proposed a tunnel project and now METRO and Caltrans have proposed several options that would have a devastating impact on our neighborhoods and our quality on life in West Pasadena. Let me be clear: I vigorously oppose all of the METRO/Caltrans routes.
(Sent July 24, 2012)
want to thank the many constituents who came to City Council last night to express their deep concern about the potential 710 freeway routes proposed for West Pasadena by METRO/Caltrans. As I have expressed earlier, I am adamantly opposed to any 710 routes that would cut through West Pasadena and threaten our quality of life and the environmental integrity of our neighborhoods. At my request this topic will be formally agendized for discussion at the August 13 City Council meeting. In anticipation of a larger audience, another venue for the meeting may be selected. We will let you know once that's been determined. Measure A, which was passed in 2001 by Pasadena voters (but soundly rejected by District 6 constituents!) gives rise to a procedural issue regarding the degree to which the City Council can oppose the specific routes being proposed by METRO/Caltrans, or the process by which those routes were proposed. I have asked the City Attorney to carefully review this issue, and to seek the guidance of outside counsel if appropriate. I do not believe that Measure A should impede any opposition by the Council to these newly proposed routes, or the flawed process that produced these routes. Please note the following meetings that our office is convening on this subject as well:710 Community ForumSeptember 187-8 p.m.Pasadena Convention Center District 6 Quarterly Town Hall Meeting September 256:30-8 p.m. Location to be Arranged
I know that many of you have corresponded directly with METRO/Caltrans. I urge you to continue to do so. METRO staff reports that in a single afternoon over 60 messages were sent in opposition to the proposed options. I understand the matter may be discussed at a meeting of the METRO board on August 29; we will keep you posted on that as well.I am working with our elected legislators and recommend that you contact them as well--Congressman Adam Schiff, State Senator Carol Liu, State Assemblyman Anthony Portantino and Supervisor Mike Antonovich. Thanks for your interest in this important issue, and please let us know any thoughts or questions you may have.
For those of you who want more information on these routes, you can find the alternatives at this link: http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/route_710/images/sr710_open_house_alt_concepts.pdf If you receive the West Pasadena Residents Association Newsletter, see page 11 of the Summer 2012 issue where you will find an informative article on the SR710.
The most important step to take now is to express your opinion. METRO and Caltrans are now in the process of paring down the list of alternatives and will issue a new list by the end of August. So, the time for us to speak out is now. To weigh in directly with METRO go to http://www.metro.net/projects/sr-710-conversations/ click on “CONTACT US” and complete the short form.
We will continue to keep you posted on the progress of this. In the meantime please do not hesitate to let us hear from you with any questions, concerns or information you have. Thanks.
On February 4, the City of Pasadena will begin the seismic retrofit and rehabilitation of Fire Station 39, located at 50 Avenue 64. The fire station, originally constructed in 1952, will receive seismic improvements and a full interior remodel which when completed in fall of 2013, will provide a structurally sound and updated fire station facility in southwest Pasadena. The project involves the seismic retrofit and interior remodel of the existing station building, accessibility and technology upgrades, and construction of a patio deck and emergency generator room. Life safety enhancements include fire sprinkler and alarm systems. The Department of Public Works, Design & Historic Preservation Section of the Planning Department, and the design team worked with Pasadena Heritage to develop a design that retains the historic exterior of the building while improving energy efficiency and public access to the station. The retrofit will achieve compliance with state structural requirements for essential facilities, helping to ensure the station remains functional after a seismic event. The rehabilitation also meets the requirements for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Silver Certification. The $1,781,000 construction project funded by City Capital Improvement Project Funds, will be undertaken by local general contractor Mallcraft Inc., starting with interior demolition, followed by installation of seismic improvements to the facility and interior improvements. Exterior improvements to the brick building façade will be accomplished in concert with State preservation guidelines that retains the historic exterior of the structure. The Department of Public Works will manage the construction project. For questions or additional information on the project, please Steve Wright, Assistant City Engineer by telephone at (626) 744-4695 or by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org. Renderings of Fire Station 39 Improvements
Download the Station 39 Fact Sheet and FAQs
Yesterday Pasadena Fire Chief Dennis Downs announced that effective today Fire Station 39 on Avenue 64 in West Pasadena is being vacated because engineering studies have determined the building does not presently meet minimum seismic safety standards. The Chief predicted that the Station will be closed for 24-30 months. I am strongly committed to reopening Station 39, either at the same site or a different site, as soon as possible, to provide essential public safety services to the Southwest portion of Pasadena. We received a presentation about this decision at our City Council meeting Monday night, in connection with a discussion of the capital budget for the upcoming fiscal year. Staff reported that the Fire Chief and City Manager made the determination to vacate the existing facility effective today. I learned of this potential development several weeks ago and have been working with staff to determine first whether this was avoidable. When it became clear after a second and even a third expert engineering opinion concurred, my focus has been on whether a temporary facility can be established, and to determine when and how the existing facility can be renovated or re-constructed on the same site or a new site. I was grateful that Monday night my colleagues expressed support for this approach by acknowledging the inclusion in the capital budget of an initial allocation of almost $1 million to pursue the renovation/relocation of Station 39 and Station 32 in East Pasadena, which has also been declared unsafe seismically. There are a total of eight fire stations in Pasadena, three of which (31, 38 and 39) are in our City Council District (which as you know is one of seven districts). Our neighborhood fire stations are extremely important to our community’s safety and, again, I am committed to reopening Station 39. It is extremely unfortunate that the existing facility has to be vacated, but protecting the men and women of our Fire Department who work and live there while on duty, cannot be compromised. In the meantime the neighborhoods served by Station 39 will be served by our Stations 31 (South Fair Oaks) and 38 (Linda Vista), as well as City of Los Angeles and South Pasadena stations with whom we have a “mutual aid“ compact. The Chief has assured me that response times will continue to be well within compliance with all national and regional standards. I will keep you posted regarding our efforts as we move forward. We will post information regarding this matter on our District 6 website at cityofpasadena.net. Steve Madison Pasadena City Councilmember, District 6
Fire Station Buffer Study Non-Pasadena Locations
Field Representative:Takako Suzuki100 N. Garfield Avenue, Room S228P.O. Box 7115 Pasadena, CA 91109-7215Map and Directions >>
Phone (626) 744-4739